Federal lawsuit filed against Dane County COVID-19 stay-at-home order – Madison.com

<a href="https://madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/federal-lawsuit-filed-against-dane-county-covid-19-stay-at-home-order/article_3efc4846-7ffd-579d-ae58-dad912afd40e.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Federal lawsuit filed against Dane County COVID-19 stay-at-home order</a>  <font color="#6f6f6f">Madison.com</font>

Federal lawsuit filed against Dane County COVID-19 stay-at-home order


Virus hot spots flare, hospitals tested as economies reopen

Owner Paul Furrer cuts the hair of Jeff Jones at Rich’s Barber Shop on Thursday, May 14, 2020, in Waukesha, Wis. The store re-opened after the Wisconsin Supreme Court struck down Gov. Tony Evers’ stay-at-home order Wednesday. (AP Photo/Morry Gash)

Morry Gash

With the Supreme Court striking down Wisconsin’s statewide stay-at-home order last week, opponents of the measures meant to slow the spread of COVID-19 have now set their sights on local emergency orders, including Dane County’s.

A group of Wisconsinites filed a lawsuit Wednesday asking a federal court to invalidate local stay-at-home orders and cease their enforcement. 

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin against Dane County and city of Madison public health director Janel Heinrich and 20 other Wisconsin officials, including the Wisconsin Elections Commission members and Gov. Tony Evers. 

The 17 plaintiffs who filed the suit include four Dane County residents, some business owners, and Madison Elmer, the organizer of the rally at the state Capitol earlier this spring to re-open the state.

The lawsuit alleges the state and local stay-at-home orders violate their civil rights to freely assemble and to freely exercise their religion. It also claims Constitutional protections against excessive government intervention through the Establishment Clause have been violated, as well as freedom of speech and right to equal protection under the law.

Two of the plaintiffs are Republicans seeking political office: Jay Schroeder, who is vying to represent the 55th state Assembly district, and Cindy Werner, who plans to challenge Democratic U.S. Rep. Gwen Moore in the 4th U.S. Congressional District, which covers Milwaukee.

They say the state’s stay-at-home order and the local orders have unlawfully prevented them from gathering the required number of signatures for ballot access. 

Ryan Nilsestuen, Evers’ chief legal counsel, said in a teleconference call with reporters on Thursday the state will be defending against the lawsuit and believes it should be dismissed.

“Local public health officers have been on the front lines in dealing with the disease and now unfortunately they’re being put at the front lines of the litigation involving these, but I’m optimistic that this lawsuit will go nowhere,” Nilsestuen said. 

The lawsuit comes after Public Health Madison and Dane County announced the county’s re-opening plan that replaces the statewide plan struck down by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. 

The order, called “Forward Dane,” mandates a phased-in approach to the size of public gatherings and the number of people allowed at one time into stores, restaurants and other venues — all based on the county’s ability to meet a range of criteria on testing, new cases and other health metrics.

The county is currently in the “prepare for safe reopen” phase and could move into the first phase of the four-phase plan as early as Tuesday. For that to happen, the county must be meeting specific benchmarks for nine criteria, including contacting 70% to 85% of all new cases within 48 hours of test collection and conducting 400 to 800 tests per day. As of Monday, the county was meeting that threshold, but new ratings are due Monday.

In a statement, Dane County executive Joe Parisi highlighted the fact that COVID-19 has claimed almost 500 lives in the state and 94,000 across the country, and is the greatest threat to safety this generation has experienced.

“We will vigorously defend common sense provisions based on public health guidance to protect the well-being of the residents of Dane County,” Parisi said. “We do not want to become the next large community consumed by the ravages of this highly contagious, debilitating virus.”

Other defendants in the case represent the city of Racine, Outagamie, Winnebago, Green and Rock counties, the City of Appleton, the Grand Chute Police Department, the Wisconsin State Capitol Police and the City of Milwaukee, as well Department of Health Services Secretary-designee Andrea Palm and Evers.

The plaintiffs are represented by Joseph W. Voiland of Veterans Liberty Law, which is based in Cedarburg. Voiland served as an Ozaukee County Circuit Court judge from 2013-2019.

The statewide Safer at Home order was overturned on May 13 by a 4-3 vote by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

State Attorney General Josh Kaul said after the decision that local orders were still legal if there was an ongoing public health emergency in a specific locality.

Only a handful of local Safer at Home orders remain in place, including in the cities of Racine and Milwaukee, and in Dane County.

Several municipalities repealed their orders after consulting with attorneys following the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision.

The Journal Times contributed to this report.

Related to this story